Architectural Bullshit, #2

"The 100 Acres Art + Nature Park and the Visitor’s Pavilion is
the result of a studied relationship between building, land and
site-art with an infinite point of view. This place is born of wildly
turbulent, nature/culture phenomena constantly changing the
land’s structure. Tinkering with it as cultivated urban wilds
proves a sound means of joining Nature and City as a recovered,
unpredictably changing but cultivated landscape. Our ongoing
ambition is to craft a logic of ideas and physical works that
may open the repressed raw power of environment, art, and
architecture through a re-thinking and re-making of where we
already are. Here, the questions posed are born from within
the found condition — an immanent response, imbued with
convincing meaning and significance for the Museum of Art,
its patrons and the citizens of Indianapolis."

(Marlon Blackwell Architects)

OK, let's try to break it down:

"..is the result of a studied relationship between building, land and site-art with an infinite point of view."
–an infinite point of view? What?

"Our ongoing ambition is to craft a logic of ideas and physical works that may open the repressed raw power of environment, art, and architecture through a re-thinking and re-making of where we already are."
–I know where you are. Somewhere between la-la land and the wrong end of bad acid trip. Fuck off. Hippie.

"Here, the questions posed are born from within the found condition — an immanent response, imbued with convincing meaning and significance.."
–I find nothing convincing about that meaning, in fact I have trouble understanding what the fuck the meaning is in the first place, imbued or otherwise.